The Pool of Siloam: What It Is, and What It Shows About the Bible. A single warm window glowing in a dark hillside village at night.

A find, and what it shows

The Pool of Siloam

John 9:7

The Pool of Siloam is a set of steps and a pool uncovered in Jerusalem, fitting the place where Jesus sent a blind man to wash in John 9. It touches that healing account and the topography of ancient Jerusalem.

“And said unto him, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam, (which is by interpretation, Sent.) He went his way therefore, and washed, and came seeing.”John 9:7

The find

The find. The Gospel of John tells how Jesus anointed a blind man's eyes and sent him to wash in the Pool of Siloam, after which the man came back seeing. Siloam lay at the lower, southern end of the ancient city, fed by the water that flowed through Hezekiah's Tunnel from the Gihon Spring. In the modern era, work in that part of Jerusalem uncovered a broad flight of stone steps descending to a pool, understood to belong to the Second Temple period, that is, the general era of Jesus. The steps and the pool basin suggest a substantial public water installation where people could gather and descend to the water, consistent with a place used for washing and perhaps for ritual purification. The discovery clarified and expanded what was previously known about Siloam, which had long been associated with a smaller pool at the tunnel's outlet. The newer finds revealed a larger and more monumental pool nearby, better matching the kind of place to which a man might be sent to wash before a crowd.

What it does and does not show

What it does and does not show. The excavation shows that a large, stepped pool existed at the southern end of Jerusalem in the general period of Jesus, at the place long identified with Siloam. This fits the setting of John 9, where the healed man is sent to wash there, and it confirms that the Gospel's geography corresponds to the real layout of the city, with water arriving at Siloam by the tunnel from the spring. Once again the value lies in confirming the setting. The pool, the steps, and the water system are real and datable, and they place the account in an actual location that people used. What the pool cannot establish is the healing itself. There is no way for stone steps to testify that a blind man washed and received his sight; that is a claim about an event, and events of that kind leave no archaeological trace. So the pool verifies where the story is set without verifying what the story reports. Stated carefully, the find supports the historical realism of John's narrative and stops short, as it must, of the miracle at its center. The honest position holds both: a real pool, and a claim that lies beyond what the pool can prove.

Where it points

Where it points. John notes that the name Siloam means Sent, and he tells of a man sent to washing water who returned able to see. The pool grounds that account in a real place at the foot of the city, fed by real springs. Yet the Gospel presents the opening of blind eyes as a sign that Jesus is the light of the world, and no excavation can confirm a sign. The recovered steps let us stand, in a sense, where the story is set, while leaving the deeper claim to faith. Paul writes that God has shined in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ, a light no pool can hold. The stones show the place of sending; the sight itself is Christ's to give.

Who is Jesus? · Begin with Jesus

A man went down worn steps in darkness and came back up in light, and the steps are still there to be walked. The path to the water can be found again; the light he received is still offered to those who come.

Questions people ask

What did the excavation of the Pool of Siloam reveal?

It revealed a large, stepped pool at the southern end of Jerusalem from the general period of Jesus, fed by the water system running from the Gihon Spring. This fits the setting of John 9 and confirms the accuracy of the Gospel's geography.

Does the Pool of Siloam prove the healing of the blind man?

No. It confirms that a real, monumental pool existed where John places the story, which supports the account's setting. The healing itself is an event that leaves no archaeological trace and lies beyond what the pool can establish.

More findsThe Pilate StoneThe Caiaphas OssuaryThe Tel Dan Stele (House of David)Hezekiah's Tunnel and the Siloam InscriptionThe Dead Sea ScrollsThe Cyrus CylinderThe Pool of BethesdaThe Merneptah Stele (Earliest Israel)Sennacherib's PrismThe Moabite Stone (Mesha Stele)The Lachish LettersThe Gallio InscriptionThe Erastus InscriptionThe Ketef Hinnom AmuletsThe James Ossuary (Disputed)Nazareth in the First CenturyThe Synagogue at Capernaum All the finds
More on reading it wellRead It in ContextWhat the Greek and Hebrew MeanThe Genres of the BibleThe Numbers of the BibleWhy This Detail MattersThe World of the BibleThe Cities of the BibleOld Testament Parallels
Enter Living Breadprayer, Scripture, a family near you